Comparison

How do cross-border payment methods compare?

There are four realistic ways to move money between countries: correspondent banking, a local payment partner in each market, self-managed stablecoin rails, or a unified settlement layer like Djingr. They differ most on three things - how long settlement takes, whether you must pre-fund destination accounts, and what adding a new market costs you.

Side by side

The four approaches compared

Correspondent banking Local partner per market Self-managed stablecoin Djingr
Typical settlement 2-5 business days Often same day in-market Minutes on-chain, plus off-ramp time ~1 min (<5 min EUR/GBP)
Pre-funding required Yes, in every destination market Yes, with each partner Yes, at each off-ramp None
Fee basis Fee per intermediary plus FX spread, often disclosed after the fact Negotiated per partner Network fee plus exchange spread plus off-ramp fee From 0.8%, published per corridor
Adding a market New banking relationship New partner and new integration New off-ramp and new compliance review Configuration
Integrations to maintain One per bank One per partner One per chain or exchange One API
Who handles cryptocurrency No one No one You do Optional - fiat-to-fiat by default

Why is correspondent banking slow?

A correspondent payment is not one transfer, it is a chain of them. The money hops between banks that hold accounts with each other until it reaches one that can pay into the destination market. Each hop adds a fee, an FX spread and a delay, and the chain only moves during business hours in each jurisdiction.

The delay is the visible cost. The larger one is usually the capital you have to leave sitting in destination accounts so payouts can clear at all - money you own but cannot use, scaling with the number of markets you operate in rather than with how much you send.

What about a local payment partner in each market?

For one or two markets this is often the right answer. A local provider knows the rails, the regulation and the payout options, and can be faster and cheaper than a correspondent chain.

It scales badly. Each additional market is a new commercial negotiation, a new integration with its own interface and reconciliation quirks, and a separate pre-funded balance. Five markets means five relationships to maintain and five balances to keep topped up.

Can you just use stablecoins directly?

You can, and for some businesses it is the right choice. Moving value on-chain is fast and the transit cost is low.

The difficulty is the last mile. Converting to local currency and reaching a bank account or mobile money wallet usually means exchanges, over-the-counter desks and manual steps, each with its own spread, limits and compliance requirements. It also means your business handles cryptocurrency directly, with the treasury, accounting and regulatory questions that brings.

Where does Djingr fit?

Djingr is the same idea as the stablecoin route with the last mile solved and the cryptocurrency handling removed. Funds are collected locally, moved across borders over the Bitcoin Lightning Network, and paid out into local bank accounts or mobile money on demand.

Because transit happens at the moment of payment, nothing has to sit pre-funded in a destination account. Adding a market is a configuration change rather than a funding decision or a new integration. Fiat-to-fiat is the default, so neither you nor your recipients need touch cryptocurrency - though you may fund or receive in Bitcoin or USDT if you want to.

When is Djingr the wrong choice?

Worth being direct about this, because no single method wins everywhere.

If you need a market Djingr does not cover, nothing else matters. Live corridors are South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, the United Kingdom and Europe, plus USDT and Bitcoin over Lightning. Brazil, the United States, Malawi and Zimbabwe are announced but not yet live. If your corridor is not on that list, a correspondent chain or a local partner is still your option.

Djingr sells to businesses and licensed financial institutions, not to consumers. An individual sending money home is not the customer; the remittance operator serving them is.

If you already move high volume on a single corridor with efficient local rails, the gain is smaller than for a business operating across several markets. The advantage compounds with the number of markets, because that is what pre-funding scales with.

Most businesses do not pick one method for everything. Keeping existing arrangements where they already work and routing the slow or expensive corridors differently is a normal outcome.

FAQ

Common questions

What is the fastest way to send money across borders?
On the corridors Djingr covers, settlement is about a minute, and under five minutes for Euro and Pound Sterling. Correspondent banking typically takes two to five business days. Speed is only half the question though - the method also has to reach the market you need.
What does correspondent banking actually cost?
The headline fee is rarely the real cost. Each intermediary bank takes a fee and adds an FX spread, and the total is often only visible after the payment lands. The larger cost for most businesses is the capital pre-funded in destination accounts, which cannot be used elsewhere.
Is a local payment partner in each market a good option?
It works well for one or two markets. It scales badly: every new market means a new commercial relationship, a new integration and separate reconciliation, and each partner still needs to be pre-funded.
Can we just use stablecoins directly?
You can, and for some businesses that is the right answer. The difficulty is the last mile - converting to local currency and reaching a bank account or mobile money wallet. That usually means exchanges, OTC desks and manual steps, and it means your business handles cryptocurrency directly.
When is Djingr the wrong choice?
If you need a market Djingr does not yet cover, no amount of speed elsewhere helps. Djingr is also business-to-business, so it is not suitable for consumer remittance senders directly. And if you already move high volume on one corridor with efficient local rails, the gain may be smaller than it is for a business operating across several markets.
Do we have to choose just one method?
No, and most businesses do not. It is common to keep existing banking relationships for markets that are already working well and route the slower or more expensive corridors differently.

See what your corridors would cost

Tell us which markets you pay into and we will show you the settlement time and the rate.

Book a Demo